It’s also worth pointing out how the former head of the Productivity Commission discusses this topic and what it means that Seymour demanded its closure.
What Nana means when he talks about productivity (as an evidence-based policy-making framework) and what N-ACT mean when they talk about productivity (punitive Protestant-derived moralit…
It’s also worth pointing out how the former head of the Productivity Commission discusses this topic and what it means that Seymour demanded its closure.
What Nana means when he talks about productivity (as an evidence-based policy-making framework) and what N-ACT mean when they talk about productivity (punitive Protestant-derived morality politics) are totally, *totally* different.
Contrast Nana’s sophisticated suggestions with van Velden’s comically pathetic ideas to cut public holidays and workplace HS.
It’s also worth pointing out how the former head of the Productivity Commission discusses this topic and what it means that Seymour demanded its closure.
What Nana means when he talks about productivity (as an evidence-based policy-making framework) and what N-ACT mean when they talk about productivity (punitive Protestant-derived morality politics) are totally, *totally* different.
Contrast Nana’s sophisticated suggestions with van Velden’s comically pathetic ideas to cut public holidays and workplace HS.