I am a bit confused by how this 'no confidence only supply policy by policy' stance. Betwen Simeon Brown's roads, roads & more rodes, Seymour's let's make the poor even poorer or Luxon's boot camps what sort of progressive policies can emerge to justify allowing the Nat-ACT combination to govern? Maybe it's a strategy to win the conservative voters of Ilam.
I am a bit confused by how this 'no confidence only supply policy by policy' stance.
Betwen Simeon Brown's roads, roads & more rodes, Seymour's let's make the poor even poorer or Luxon's boot camps what sort of progressive policies can emerge to justify allowing the Nat-ACT combination to govern?
Maybe it's a strategy to win the conservative voters of Ilam.
I am a bit confused by how this 'no confidence only supply policy by policy' stance.
Betwen Simeon Brown's roads, roads & more rodes, Seymour's let's make the poor even poorer or Luxon's boot camps what sort of progressive policies can emerge to justify allowing the Nat-ACT combination to govern?
Maybe it's a strategy to win the conservative voters of Ilam.