Re whether to make more of the content public. I don't have an issue if you feel it is in the public interest to share more content. One of the good things about sharing only with subscribers is that you don't have to self-censor to make what you say widely palatable. I am here for your research and your analysis, not anodyne material for wide appeal. However you do that is up to you.
Re whether to make more of the content public. I don't have an issue if you feel it is in the public interest to share more content. One of the good things about sharing only with subscribers is that you don't have to self-censor to make what you say widely palatable. I am here for your research and your analysis, not anodyne material for wide appeal. However you do that is up to you.
Thanks Lynn. It's been a while since I had to self-censor myself. But I'm also careful to ensure anything I say or do can 'live' in public. IE I remain open to being challenged or corrected by anyone and have to document my facts and points by referencing other sources and tools. Appreciate the support.
Re whether to make more of the content public. I don't have an issue if you feel it is in the public interest to share more content. One of the good things about sharing only with subscribers is that you don't have to self-censor to make what you say widely palatable. I am here for your research and your analysis, not anodyne material for wide appeal. However you do that is up to you.
Thanks Lynn. It's been a while since I had to self-censor myself. But I'm also careful to ensure anything I say or do can 'live' in public. IE I remain open to being challenged or corrected by anyone and have to document my facts and points by referencing other sources and tools. Appreciate the support.
Nice point Lynn.